CA.).įor more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Schiff Nutrition International and ’s coverage of the company, click here.
They're the PJ500 and PJ550, ViewSonic's go-anywhere 5.3 lb. and Reckitt Benckiser North America, Inc., Case No. As competitors move ahead on everything from SOAP to nuts, Microsoft's lead. Schiff Nutrition, Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., Schiff Nutrition Group, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc. To learn more about the Lerma case, click here. 63 oz jars of Tiger Balm Ultra Strength: 10.45 1 36-count box of Tiger Balm Pain Relieving Patches: 38.49 The price of Tiger Balm is about average for most topical pain relievers, however it is less cost effective as a daily supplement. Schiff), and that settlement, if approved, would also settle the claims in this case.ĭecember 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Schiff Nutrition for allegedly advertising its Move Free® line of dietary supplements containing glucosamine and chondroitin as providing various joint health benefits – such as helping to protect cartilage and improving joint comfort and function – without the scientific evidence to support such claims. 63 oz jar of Tiger Balm Ultra Strength: 6.11 Package of 2.
November 2014: The parties in the lawsuit asked the court to suspend the judicial proceedings in the case because Schiff Nutrition reached a settlement agreement in another similar case ( Lerma v. Wolfson complained to the airline on both occasions but when it failed to respond, she decided to sue for violation of Israeli law, which prohibits discrimination against customers on the basis of race, religion, nationality, land of origin, gender, sexual orientation, political views or personal status.Īlthough easyJet is not based in Israel, lawyers will argue that the airline was subject to Israeli law while its plane was on the ground at Ben-Gurion airport, where the incident took place.November 2015: After the settlement in the Lerma case was approved in October 2015, this lawsuit was dismissed. Members of the cabin crew did not intervene or try to defend her right to stay seated where she was although again she was offered a free hot drink, according to the suit. She refused their request but two female passengers agreed to change seats with the two men sitting next to her. Two months later, on another easyJet flight to London, Wolfson was again asked to move seats by two ultra-Orthodox men. “There were passengers watching this happen who said nothing,” she said.Īccording to the suit, several flight attendants told Wolfson during the flight that women were often asked to switch seats in order to accommodate ultra-Orthodox men. Concerned that the flight might be delayed on her account and feeling that she had little choice in the matter, she agreed to switch seats. “I would not have had any problem whatsoever switching seats if it were to allow members of a family or friends to sit together, but the fact that I was being asked to do this because I was a woman was why I refused.”Ī flight attendant intervened and offered Wolfson a free hot drink as an incentive to move. “It was the first time in my adult life that I was discriminated against for being a woman,” she told Haaretz.
Wolfson says she was “insulted and humiliated” by the request. An ultra-Orthodox man and his son, who were sitting in the row when she arrived, asked Wolfson to switch seats with a man a few rows ahead.
MOVE FREE ULTRA LAWSUIT PROFESSIONAL
Wolfson, a professional fundraiser who moved to Israel 13 years ago and lives in Tel Aviv, is also asking that easyJet bans its cabin crew from asking women to switch seats because of their gender.Īccording to the lawsuit, Wolfson paid extra for an aisle seat on her flight last October.
0 kommentar(er)
